FORMER NATO HEAD REJECTS IRAN DEAL – AT 10:14 A.M. ET:   While the usual suspects, led by The New York Times, line up to support the Iran deal, more thoughtful voices are showing just how bad the deal is.  From the Washington Free Beacon: 

Retired Admiral James Stavridis rejected key talking points used by the Obama administration to sell the Iran nuclear deal in an interview Wednesday.

Admiral Stavridis, who served as NATO Supreme Allied Commander and is now Dean of the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, told MSNBC’s Morning Joe the deal may not catch Iranian nuclear cheating if it occurs.

“I think the top [issue] is the verification regime, which is starting to roughly resemble Swiss cheese,” Stavridis said. “You can drive a truck through some of the holes. I am very concerned about that.”

Defenders of the deal, such as Secretary of State John Kerry, have insisted the deal’s verification measures are airtight.

Stavridis expressed concern over Iran’s side deal about inspections with the IAEA, which may allow Iran to take its own environmental samples from suspicious sites.

“We need to have access to it and understand it,” Stavridis said about the side deal. “Reportedly, it puts Iran in the position of actually procuring samples as opposed to having them taken by the IAEA.”

Stavridis said his biggest concern with the deal is its gift of hundreds of billions in economic activity and previously frozen assets to Iran, the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism.

“The biggest problem here is the airdrop of $100 to $150 billion into their economy, which is only $350 billion to begin with,” Stavridis said. “That’s like the U.S. getting a $4 trillion insertion of capital. That’s the teeth of the alligator you just heard about.”

Under the nuclear deal, Iran would gain access to foreign businesses and key financial networks, which will generate the steady revenue necessary to revitalize Iran’s military and allies.

COMMENT:  And yet, proponents of the deal say it must be supported because it's the only deal we have, and better than nothing.  That reminds me of the old story about a guy who throws a 15-foot rope to a man who's drowning 20 feet out and shouts, "I'm meeting you more than halfway."

It's a terrible agreement.  It violates all the red lines that the administration itself publicized at the start of the talks.  It's about Obama's legacy, and little else. 

July 30, 2015